Domain controller: LDAP server signing requirements and Simple Binds

Published on Thursday, September 22, 2016 in

Lately I’ve been wondering about the impact of the following setting: Domain controller: LDAP server signing requirements. The documentation (TechNet #1 and TechNet #2 ) spells it out pretty well: This policy setting determines whether the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server requires LDAP clients to negotiate data signing. You can set it to either None or Required. None is the default and allows signing if the client asks for it.

Sometimes when I read information I read too fast and draw my conclusion. Shame on me. Wrong conclusion from my side: configuring this setting to required requires all connection to use LDAPS (TCP 636). Nope. It says data signing! Signing can be perfectly done with traffic targetted at both LDAP (TCP 389) or LDAPS (TCP 636).

From AskDS: Understanding LDAP Security Processing I learned various things about simple binds. Simple binds send your username and password in clear text. Needless to say that in combination with LDAP you’re at risk. On the other hand, if the communication is using LDAPS, sending passords in clear text could be acceptable. 

Now the documentation I referenced earlier is a bit conflicting on this topic:

  • This setting does not have any impact on LDAP simple bind or LDAP simple bind through SSL.
  • If signing is required, then LDAP simple bind and LDAP simple bind through SSL requests are rejected.
  • Require signature. The LDAP data-signing option must be negotiated unless Transport Layer Security/Secure Sockets Layer (TLS/SSL) is in use.

Now it might be just me but I would phrase that in another way. Both articles suffer from the same wording. So like with any other uncertainty we just test it. Once you see and experience it you’ll never forget!

This is part of the Default Domain Controller Policy on Windows Server 2012 R2:


I changed it to:


Now using LDP.exe we can do some tests:

Connecting over LDAPS:


Performing a simple bind:


And the result:


Now if we try to connect over LDAP:


Bind like before. But now we get:


In words: Error <8>: ldap_simple_bind_s() failed: Strong Authentication Required
Server error: 00002028: LdapErr: DSID-0C090202, comment: The server requires binds to turn on integrity checking if SSL\TLS are not already active on the connection, data 0, v2580
Error 0x2028 A more secure authentication method is required for this server.


All of this is definitely not new. But writing about it helps me never forget it. Setting the LDAP Server Signing Settings to required will probably require some planning and testing. But it doesn’t mean you can’t use simple binds. As long as you can configure your application to use LDAPS. Your domain controller should be logging a warning event every once in a while when simple binds or unsigned LDAP traffic is seen. Here’s some more info on this event: Event ID 2887 — LDAP signing.

If you want to read more on LDAP signing, please check KB935834: How to enable LDAP signing in Windows Server 2008

Related Posts

4 Response to Domain controller: LDAP server signing requirements and Simple Binds

06 September, 2017 05:03

Thanks for the info, if we put require signing, do we need to install ssl cert as well on all domain controllers ?

28 November, 2017 17:56

Thanks for the post, it is very helpful. I've run into this issue, when setting up Citrix Netscaler v12. A simple bind would fail with Invalid Credentials. Running ldp.exe on the DC provided me with a clue, but not an answer. I've search for more than a week on this issue. Finally find the answer in your blog. It is appreciated. Apparently the GPO setting is set to 'required', but no LDAPS setup. Off to work that part out.

Thanks Again!

29 November, 2017 22:03

thanks for taking the time to post back! Much appreciated!

23 February, 2020 20:35

Regarding to the march 2020 update your article is up-to-the-minute:).

I was also wondering and a little bit confused:) about the conflicting explanation at the group policy explain register.

First they say the setting of signing is required does not have any impact on LDAP simple bind with or without SSL. And then the next section they say both simple binds with or without SSL would be rejected if this setting is enabled.

WTF? :)

simple binds through SSL works and would not rejected with signing required.

Hope they will correct the explanation with the march 2020 update.


Add Your Comment